Search

Search

Course syllabus The Russo-Ukraine war: multidisciplinary perspectives

Swedish name: Kriget mellan Ryssland och Ukraina: mångvetenskapliga perspektiv

Course code:
3KR0007
Valid from semester:
Spring Term 2026
Education cycle:
Third cycle
Scope:
7.5 credits
Grading scale:
Two-grade scale
Department:
Department of War Studies
Subject:
War Studies
Language of instruction:
The teaching is conducted in English.

Entry requirements

Admitted to a doctoral programme at a national or international university.

Course content and structure

The course offers the doctoral student the opportunity to immerse him- or herself in theories and scholarship that describe, interpret and explain the war between Russia and Ukraine.

By offering opportunities for the doctoral student to position War Studies perspectives into a broadened multidisciplinary context - in particular through the research environment at the Centre for Baltic and East European Studies that focuses on the Baltic Sea region and Eastern Europe - the course strengthens the doctoral student’s ability to apply critical perspectives to analyses of the Russo-Ukrainian war.

The learning activities of the course provide the doctoral student with opportunities to critically reflect on military, historical, political, cultural and societal aspects of the Russo-Ukraine War, and to identify and reflect on the international implications of this war. The course engages with contrubutions made by War Studies on the importance of military culture, the relationship between technology and tactical/operational action, and highlights historical, political, cultural, and societal perspectives from the multidisciplinary research area of Baltic and East European Studies. The aim is thus to strengthen the abilities of the doctoral student to consider different aspects of, and perspectives on, the Russo-Ukraine War and to reflect on the conduct of warfare from different points of view.

Based on a War Studies knowledge base, the doctoral student builds their ability to understand war from multidisciplinary perspectives, through seminars, lectures and self-study. Through multidisciplinary insights gained from Baltic and East European Studies and through the collaboration with Södertörn University, the doctoral student is provided with opportunities to improve their ability to analyze the generation and deployment of military power in the Russo-Ukrainian war within a Baltic and East European context.

Type of instruction


Lectures, seminars and self-study.

Objectives

Upon completion of the course the doctoral student should be able to:

Knowledge and understanding
  • explain how analyses of the Russo-Ukraine War based on research in War Studies can be broadened and deepened with knowledge drawn from other disciplines
  • identify the contribution of Baltic and East European Studies to War Studies

Competence and skills 
  • combine theories in War Studies with multidisciplinary perspectives to describe, interpret and explain the Russo-Ukraine War
  • problematise and critically evaluate the central arguments and concepts within Baltic and East European Studies

Judgement and approach
  • evaluate theories and research in War Studies to describe, interpret and explain the Russo-Ukraine War
  • independently reflect on the different perspectives of state and non-state actors on the causes and consequences of the war
  • critically reflect on the international implications of the war.

Examination formats

Assessment is conducted through active participation in mandatory seminars and the submission of a shorter written assignment and a more extended written assignment.

Grading


The student is graded on a two-point grading scale: Fail (U) and Pass (G). Grading criteria are reported at the latest at the start of the course.

To earn the grade Pass (G), the doctoral student must actively participate in the mandatory seminars and have attained a grade of Pass (G) on the two written assignments.

Restrictions in number of examinations


There is no limit on the total number of examination opportunities.

Other regulations

  • The course cannot be included in a degree with another course whose content fully or partially corresponds to the content of this course.
  • If the Swedish Defence University has formally decided that the doctoral student is entitled to receive special educational support due to a disability, the examiner may decide on alternative forms of examination for the student.
  • Upon completion of the course, the course director will conduct an evaluation, which informs any changes to the course.
Reading list decided date: 2026-04-28
Amos Fox. 2022. “Manoeuvre is Dead? Understanding the Conditions and Components of Warfighting”, The RUSI Journal 166: 6-7, pp. 10-18.
Franz-Stefan Gady and Michael Kofman. 2024. “Making Attrition Work: A Viable Theory of Victory for Ukraine”, Survival 66: 1, pp. 7-24.
Valery Zaluzhny. 2023 (November 1). “Modern Positional Warfare and How to Win It”, The Economist.
Yury Baluevsky. 2023. “Foreword”. In Mikhail Sergeyevich Barabanov (ed.), Algoritmi ognya i stali [Algorithms of fire and steel]. Moscow: Tsentr analiza strategiy i technologiy, pp. 6-17.
Christopher John Chivers. 2024 (December 31) “How Suicide Drones Transformed the Front Lines in Ukraine”, The New York Times.
Jade McGlynn. 2002. Memory Makers: the Politics of the Past in Putin’s Russia, Bloomsbury Publishing: London. Chapters: “Taking Back Control of History”, pp. 15 – 53; “Past and Present: The Historical Framing of Ukraine, Sanctions and Syria”, pp. 107-173.
Barbara Törnquist-Plewa and Yuliya Yurchuk. 2019. “Memory Politics in Contemporary Ukraine. Reflections from the Post-Colonial Perspective”, Memory Studies Journal 2: 6, pp. 699-720.
Yuliya Yurchuk. 2022. “Building a Patrimonial Church: How the Orthodox Churches in Ukraine Use the Past”. In Zuzanna Bogumil and Yuliya Yurchuk (eds.), Memory and Religion from a Postsecular Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 90-110.
Andreas Kappeler. 2014. “Ukraine and Russia: Legacies of the Imperial Past and Competing Memories”, Journal of Eurasian studies 5: 2, pp. 107-115.
Alexandr Osipian. 2024. “Political Justification of Territorial Expansion from Catherine II to Putin: Inventing ‘Novorossiya’ in Imperial and in Post-Imperial Context”. In Sebastian Fahner, Christian Feichtinger and Rogier E. M. Heijden (eds.), Politics of Pasts and Futures in (Post-)Imperial Contexts. Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, pp. 165-196.
Kuzio, T. 2024. “Historical Preparation and Ideological Legitimisation of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine: A Critical Discourse”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies 32: 3, pp. 850-869.
Kseniya Oksamytna. 2023. “Imperialism, Supremacy, and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine”, Contemporary Security Policy 44: 4, pp. 497-512.
Deborah Sanders. 2023. “Ukraine’s Third Wave of Military Reform 2016–2022. Building a Military Able to Defend Ukraine against the Russian Invasion”, Defense & Security Analysis 39:3, pp. 312-328.
Mark Galeotti. 2016. “Hybrid, Ambiguous, and Non-linear? How New is Russia’s ‘New Way of War’?” Small Wars & Insurgencies 27: 2, pp. 282-301.
Markus Balázs Göransson. 2023. “A Strategy of Limited Actions. Russia’s Ground-Based Forces in Syria”. In Mikael Weissmann and Niklas Nilsson (eds.), Advanced Land Warfare. Tactics and Operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279-300.
Nikolay Mitrokhin. 2021. “Infiltration, Instruction, Invasion. Russia’s War in the Donbas”. In Jakob Hauter (ed.), Civil War? Interstate War? Hybrid War? Dimensions and Interpretations of the Donbas Conflict in 2014-2020. Stuttgart: Ibidem, pp. 113-144.
Niklas Nilsson. 2021. “De-Hybridization and Conflict Narration”. In Mikael Weissmann, Niklas Nilsson, Björn Palmertz and Per Thunholm (eds.), Hybrid Warfare. New York: I.B. Tauris, pp. 214-231.
Garth S. Jowett and Victoria O'Donnell. 2012. Propaganda & Persuasion. London: Sage. 5th ed. pp. 1-50.
Intigam Mamedov. 2024. “A Fragile Narrative: Transformations and Consistency in the Russian Representation of the War in Ukraine”, Media, War & Conflict 18: 3, pp. 383-399.
Keir Giles. 2016. Handbook of Russian Information Warfare. Rome: NATO Defense College, Research Division, pp. 1-44.
Dani Belo and Federmán Rodríguez. 2023. “The Conflict in Ukraine and Its Global Implications”, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 29: 3, pp. 235-248.
Ondrej Ditrych and Martin Laryš. 2023. “What Can a European Security Architecture Look Like in the Wake of Russia’s War on Ukraine?” European Security 34: 1, pp. 44-64.
Trine Flockhart and Elena N. Korosteleva. 2022. “War in Ukraine: Putin and the Multi-Order World”, Contemporary Security Policy 43: 3, pp. 466-481.
Kristi Raik, Steven Blockmans, Anna Osypchuk and Anton Suslov. 2024. “EU Policy towards Ukraine: Entering Geopolitical Competition over European Order”, The International Spectator 59:1, pp. 39-58
Stephen M. Walt. 2022 (March 8). “An International Relations Theory Guide to the War in Ukraine”, Foreign Policy.
Peter R. Mansoor and Williamson Murray. 2019. The Culture of Military Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters:
  • Peter R. Mansoor and Williamson Murray, “Introduction”, pp. 1–14.
  • Leonard Wong and Stephen J. Gerras, “Culture and Military Organizations”, pp. 17–32.
  • David Kilcullen, “Strategic Culture”, pp. 33–52.

Catherine Wanner. 2022. Everyday Religiosity and the Politics of Belonging in Ukraine. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 25-43, 149-182.
Dmytro Vovk. 2024. “The Russia–Ukraine War, the Orthodox Church, and Religious Freedom”, Religion, State and Society 52: 4, pp. 431–433.
Mick Ryan. 2024. The War for Ukraine. Strategy and Adaptation Under Fire. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, pp. 134-198

Krisztián Jójárt. 2024. “The War against Ukraine through the Prism of Russian Military Thought”, Journal of Strategic Studies 47, 6–7, pp. 801–831.
Maria Mälksoo. 2021. "Militant Memocracy in International Relations: Mnemonical Status Anxiety and Memory Laws in Eastern Europe", Review of International Studies 47: 4, pp. 489-507.
Karl Gustafsson and Maria Mälksoo. 2024. "Memory-Political Deterrence: Shielding Collective Memory and Ontological Security through Dissuasion", International Studies Quarterly 68: 1, pp. 2-12.
Ilmari Käihkö. 2021. “A Conventional War: Escalation in the War in Donbas, Ukraine,” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 34:1, pp. 24-49.
Andrew Wilson. 2016. “The Donbas in 2014: Explaining Civil Conflict Perhaps, but not Civil War”, Europe-Asia Studies 68: 4, pp. 631–652.
Christopher Till. 2021. “Propaganda through ‘Reflexive Control’ and the Mediated Construction of Reality”, New Media & Society 23: 6: pp. 1362-1378.
Yevhen Fedchenko. 2016. “Kremlin Propaganda: Soviet Active Measures by Other Means”, Sõjateadlane 2, pp. 141-170.
Roman Horbyk, Yana Prymachenko and Dariya Orlova. 2023. ”The Transformation of Propaganda: The Continuities and Discontinuities of Information Operations, from Soviet to Russian Active Measures”, Nordic Journal of Media Studies 5: 1, pp. 68–94.
Sven Biscop. 2023 (June). "War for Ukraine and the Rediscovery of Geopolitics", Egmont Paper. Brussels: Egmont Institute.

Piotr Wawrzeniuk. 2026. ”Forging Uniform Identity? Ukraine’s Military Culture and Symbolism in the Post-Soviet Era”. In Anne Marie Hagen and Kjetil Enstad (eds.), Advancing Military Practice through Military Humanities, London: Routledge, pp. 205-221.
Anna Mariya Basauri Ziuzina, Iryna Fenno, Ruslan Khalikov and Uliana Sevastianiv. 2023. “The Impact of War on Christian Communities of Ukraine (Based on Materials from the Religion on Fire Project)”, Review of Ecumenical Studies 15: 3, pp. 405–428.
Heather Coleman. 2024 (May 24). “Interview with Denys Brylov. ‘Ukrainian Muslims Fulfill Diplomatic Role, Explaining the Situation to their Co-Religionists in Other Countries”, Edmonton: Forum for Ukrainian Studies.